天天中彩票官方网站|天天中彩票攻略

来源：天天中彩票技巧2023-07-24 17:48

天天中彩票官方网站

四川两会：政协委员建言加快现代化产业体系建设******

　　中新网成都1月12日电 (王利文)四川省政协委员、九三学社四川省委会监督委员会副主任延华表示，大力建设现代化产业体系要坚持把发展经济的着力点放在实体经济上。

　　12日，四川省两会正在此间举行。“如何加快建设现代化产业体系”频频被参会的政协委员提及，成为热词之一。

　　2023年四川省政府工作报告提出，过去五年，四川创造和转化优势壮大实体经济，加快构建现代化产业体系，新旧动能接续转换迈出坚实步伐。未来，四川将加快构建现代化产业体系。加快传统制造业转型升级，培育先进制造业集群，推进数字产业化产业数字化。

　　民进四川省委会围绕推进网络强省、发展数字经济，强化川渝协同电子信息产业创新能力提升等主题提出建议；民革四川省委会提出《关于打造世界级无人机产业集群的建议》；民盟四川省委会关注生物医药等领域，提出共建成渝生物医药产业创新高地，推动生物医药产业高质量发展的建议。

　　“民营企业是现代化产业体系中的重要组成部分，作为实体经济中最活跃的主体，民营企业在就业、税收、创新等方面发挥了巨大作用。”四川省政协委员、九三学社四川省委会监督委员会副主任延华建议，实体经济企业应提升经营能力，加大在产品研发、技术创新、人才队伍建设等方面的投入，向产业“微笑曲线”两端发力，还应进一步恢复和提振民营企业的信心，在现代化产业体系建设中发挥更大的作用。

四川省政协委员、九三学社四川省委会监督委员会副主任延华。　王磊摄

　　传统产业转型升级也是加快建设现代化产业体系的重点之一。数据显示，2022年四川省茶业综合产值达1080亿元，稳居全国第三。在四川省政协委员、四川省茶叶集团股份有限公司董事长颜泽文看来，近年来四川交通、水利等基础设施不断改善，茶产业等传统产业发展向好，虽然四川农业现代化基础较好，但农业现代化率和市场占有率不高等短板依旧存在。

　　对此，颜泽文建议，农业现代化应因地制宜选准优势产业并围绕产业布局配套设施。此外，龙头企业要坚持在科技引领和人才培养上下功夫，加大科技成果转换，提高产品附加值。“以我们集团为例，未来要做规模、做品牌、做文化，缩小和其他城市的差距，带动更多中小茶企走向全国。”

　　在新兴产业规模化方面，软件开源生态建设受到四川省政协委员、电子科技大学信息与软件工程学院院长周世杰关注。他指出，开源已成为全球IT企业共同的战略选择，开源软件可为企业节省8%的成本。针对四川软件开源生态建设体制机制不全、专业组织欠缺、专业人才匮乏等问题，周世杰建议，要推进平台建设、激励开放共享、引导推广应用、制订规范标准、加强产权保护、加快人才培养，推动软件开源生态助力四川软件产业高质量发展，助力四川现代化产业体系建设。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.